Loading ...Parts
“You really don’t need to screen people for vitamin D deficiency who are low-risk or asymptomatic,” says Dr. Kendall Moseley, medical director of the Johns Hopkins Metabolic Bone & Osteoporosis Center. “One of the reasons that there’s been an ‘increased prevalence’ in vitamin D deficiency over the last five to 10 years or so isn’t really because we’re all becoming vitamin D deficient. We’re just looking more for it now.”
A landmark study published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine backs up Moseley’s stance. Researchers studied 25,871 participants — men aged 50 and older and women 55 and older — and determined that vitamin D supplements had no tangible effect on the health of “generally healthy midlife and older adults.”
Comment:
I hear they are talking about phasing out unneeded cholesterol too. Half or more of the population are on various pills and supplements they don’t need and tptb may be retraining
parts
“You really don’t need to screen people for vitamin D deficiency who are low-risk or asymptomatic,” says Dr. Kendall Moseley, medical director of the Johns Hopkins Metabolic Bone & Osteoporosis Center. “One of the reasons that there’s been an ‘increased prevalence’ in vitamin D deficiency over the last five to 10 years or so isn’t really because we’re all becoming vitamin D deficient. We’re just looking more for it now.”
A landmark study published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine backs up Moseley’s stance. Researchers studied 25,871 participants — men aged 50 and older and women 55 and older — and determined that vitamin D supplements had no tangible effect on the health of “generally healthy midlife and older adults.”