Loading ...Neglects to account for why ? its another 30 years of earnings .at least $900,000 ! Which means Savers Vs Spenders…
I suppose its why SS dosen’t give 65 and over almost nothing adjusted for INFLATION, that was mostly incurred in the Last 30 years.!
I suppose its why theres free food,free cell phones,free healthcare ,but almost nothing for inflation adjustment for the Retired .
Never mind they paid for what they get forceablly taken from their paychecks for 50 years or so,and those SElF employed paid BOTH employee and employer side !.It makes it sound like those over 65 are RICH and the under 35 are Poor ,such things should NEVER be taken for FACE value,without taking into account who worked for what they get and who didn’t ….Making STUPID comparisons like NET WORTH of over 65 VS under 35 gives a stupid sence of inequality that Socialists use to justify INCOME REDISTRIBUTION ….Don’t let them get away with that kind of NONSENCE ! Anybody that makes those kind of comparisons has an AGENDA …Whenever they PROCESS WORDS instead of facts be suspect of the Motives !!!