OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

Auandag, Silverngold

Posted by Buygold @ 23:21 on February 13, 2016  

I believe the story is not true about the Russians training here. I recently spoke with an active duty Army friend and asked him the question point blank. He’d heard nothing like that, and he’d be in the know. There’s no way something like that could be kept silent. The story is old, Dave from Common Sense is wrong. JMHO

Auandag….Rumors I’ve Heard

Posted by silverngold @ 22:49 on February 13, 2016  

Shortly after 911 was pulled off I read that all public lands in the US had been turned over to the UN. Sorry I do not remember the source but they posted some proofs similar to the National Park sign the lady spoke of in the video you posted.

Then when Obama became the (illegal) President of the US I was quite surprised to learn he had immediately sent Hillary Clinton to China to give China Eminent Domain over the US in the event the US defaulted on its debt to China……But if that were the case, what about  all Public lands belonging to the UN??

If both of the above are true, then it becomes clearer now with this new information about Russian military and UN troops being in the US. My thinking is that somewhere along the way all public US land was given to the UN. That also ties in with BLM trying to get the ranchers off their land and any and all claims they may have on public land nullified. Also it was just mentioned that in the case of Burns Oregon the FBI was said to be pulling out and being replaced with mercenaries (UN?) who were claiming to be FBI. So that leaves all the private land in the US available to China through Eminent Domain….but what to do with the land owners of that private land?? It doesn’t look like Martial Law will work using US military because most will not fire on their own citizens…..so here comes Russian troops and/or mercenary (UN) troops into the picture to do the roundup of US citizens, and where will they be put??

There are the 800+ FEMA camps across the US and no end of speculation as to their purpose, but they seem to be the answer to the dilemma. Mercenary troops who have no loyalty to the US or its citizens move in, round up the citizens and transport them to the FEMA camps where they will be “re-educated” or more likely just disappear.

And this also ties in with Obama’s almost desperate attempt to remove America’s guns using many false flag  agendas to do so.

Well, I expect to be asked what I’ve been smoking but it all seems to be falling into place like a giant puzzle, and unfortunately I don’t think we will have long to wait to find out if it is true.

And I get to trademark “Zionized”

Posted by macroman3 @ 22:42 on February 13, 2016  

Hi North

Auandag, that was entertaining at 17:42 and McChrystal clear.

Posted by macroman3 @ 22:38 on February 13, 2016  

I’m betting the next President that gets Zionized with a pair of 9 mens medium is an inside SS job.

No more Bush outsourcing to the “Who flew over the Cuckcoo nest”.

Newtogold 17:11

Posted by goldielocks @ 22:05 on February 13, 2016  

With Justicce Scalia gone may he RIP we have to pay attention to congress as the demos particulary O and Killery going after the second amendment now by who O will try to sneak in his place. Killary in particular is going after hand guns. This could be a big deal. Plus they want to push a world court on us if we don’t have constitutional justices to uphold the constitution.

The slime wanna be commies are coming out with joy over his death. I would wish it on them if we could put them all in one state with all the illegals , criminals and no guns put walls around them and let them see how they like it..



Posted by goldielocks @ 20:32 on February 13, 2016  

Founding Fathers Tried to Warn Us About the Threat From a Two-Party System

Polls show that a majority of Americans say that both the Republicans and Democrats are doing such a poor job representing the people that a new, third party is needed.

I’ve repeatedly warned that there is a scripted, psuedo-war between Dems and Repubs, liberals and conservatives which is in reality a false divide-and-conquer dog-and-pony show created by the powers that be to keep the American people divided and distracted. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

In fact, the Founding Fathers warnedus about the threat from a two party system.

John Adams said:

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.
George Washington agreed, saying in his farewell presidential speech:

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion, that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the Government, and serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in Governments of a Monarchical cast, Patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And, there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

Yo Larryc

Posted by Buygold @ 20:00 on February 13, 2016  

There just ain’t no right or wrong, or good guys left in this system. There’s only worse and worser. There’s only is and isnt’s. I’m lost, way lost and getting loster. 🙂

Good to see you back posting.

Agree. Kind of.

Posted by larryc @ 18:48 on February 13, 2016  

I don’t disagree with much of anything that  has been said. I get my pants wadded up when we start the blame game. We have immense problems, and they’re getting worse.  When I reach left, it’s the fault of the right.  When I reach right, it’s the fault of the left.  Finger pointing.  What a waste.

I’m a Realtor, so am not only familiar with the eminent domain problem, but contribute $1,000 per year to a political action committee to help in the fight over the government’s overreaching in confiscation of private land.  Don’t school me.

Confiscation?  Yes, I read too. We have problems, don’t we. Needs to be fixed, doesn’t it.  I think you missed the magnitude of my example.


Posted by Auandag @ 18:44 on February 13, 2016  

If America is demonizing Putin and threatening war with Russia, why are Russian soldiers on US soil. Or is the following article b#llsh#t.


larryc re Who was the moron?

Posted by Mr.Copper @ 18:23 on February 13, 2016  

They are the third generation of people from far away, England and Europe, that have influence on the USA and each and every USA president since 1913.

The Fed Res Act was specifically created so the USA could finance wars. Look it up. Its in old books regarding the financial system.

1913 led to 1917 WW I, which caused the inflationary roaring 20s, and the deflationary 30s, which led to outlawing Gold ownership for American citizens in 1934. Confiscated at $19 and promptly raised to $35.

That stunt enabled USA to finance (INFLATE AGAIN) WW II, Korea, Vietnam, moon landings and IMPORTS, which led to Trade deficit causing USA losing half its Gold supply to Europe at $35 when trading naturally at $140. Stopped that in 1971, only to lose INDUSTRIES after 1971 instead of Gold reserves.

Look it all up. This is stuff Trump needs to know. He’s not saying a lot of things he should be saying, leading me to believe he may just be another global gov’t flunky representative.

TPTB’s bright Idea may be, like Ron Reagan, get someone in that says the right things, (I’m patriotic, anti establishment) someone that everybody knows and likes, with the assumption that the US masses will be happy, and psychologically help the US economy grow. Without its industries of course.

TPTB don’t seem to want to stop USA outsourcing which is really wealth distribution or welfare for the needy and greedy foreign nations. That means needy and greedy foreign nations are in control of our country.

Plain and simple.

r.i.p. scalia

Posted by treefrog @ 18:09 on February 13, 2016  

supreme ct justice antonin scalia found dead in texas


Auandag @ 17:42 Very enlightening!!

Posted by silverngold @ 18:01 on February 13, 2016  

If people don’t read any others, I recommend they read the last one at the bottom. It is PRICELESS!! I’m still laughing!!

Overthrowing Hussein

Posted by larryc @ 17:48 on February 13, 2016  

Who was the moron that decided to overthrow Saddam Hussein?

Who decided these these religious fanatics wanted democracy?

Who made that decision?

Who will be held accountable?

What liberal will be held accountable  for their war crimes?

Start with the three amigos.

George Bush

Dick Chaney

Donald Rumsfeld

Gaddafi.  How far back do you want to go? In 1986 then President Reagan authorized air strikes against Gaddafi, Operation El Dorado Canyon.  In 2011,  President Obama authorized our joining Canada, Britain & France to finish the deal.  Good idea?  Obviously a conservative wants to think it was a bad idea, and liberals are responsible.  I can’t stretch that far.  Nice to see you can.

Assad has not yet been overthrown.  Maybe we could wait until he is before we decide which liberal is to blame. In the mean time, I need to get on with my life.

Posted by Auandag @ 17:42 on February 13, 2016  
Interesting Book !!!!!!!
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                      stand in line 1                                      jpg.jpg?attredirects=0
Very interesting but not surprising. Scroll down to read what Kessler thinks of the presidents he served. And now, you’ll know the rest of the story.
Interesting snippets from Ronald Kessler’s book about our presidents.
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                          stand in line 2                                          .jpg?attredirects=0 
*A philanderer of the highest order.*      
*She ordered the kitchen help to save all the left-over wine from State dinners, mixed it with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                              stand in line 3                                              .jpg?attredirects=0
*Another philanderer of the highest order. In addition, LBJ was as crude as the day is long. Both JFK and LBJ kept a lot of women in the White House for extramarital affairs and both had set up early warning systems to alert them if/when their wives were nearby. Both were promiscuous and oversexed men.*
*She was either naive or just pretended to not know about her husband’s many liaisons.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                                stand in line 4                                                .jpg?attredirects=0
*A “moral” man but very odd, weird, paranoid. He had a horrible relationship with his family and was almost a recluse.*
*She was quiet most of the time.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                                stand in line 5                                                .jpg?attredirects=0
*Nice, decent man. Everyone in the Secret Service was surprised by his downfall.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                              stand in line 6                                              .jpg?attredirects=0
*A true gentlemen who treated the Secret Service with respect and dignity. He had a great sense of humour. *
*She drank a lot!*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                              stand in                                              line7.jpg?attredirects=0
*A complete phony who would portray one picture of himself to public and very different in private e.g. would be shown carrying his own luggage but the suitcases were always empty. He kept empty ones just for photo ops. He wanted people to see him as pious and a non-drinker but he and his family drank alcohol a lot! He had disdain for the Secret Service and was very irresponsible with the “football” with nuclear codes. He didn’t think it was a big deal and would keep military aides at a great distance. Often did not acknowledge the presence of Secret Service personnel assigned to serve him.*
*She mostly did her own thing.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                      stand in line 8 .jpg?attredirects=0
*The real deal, moral, honest, respectful and dignified. They treated Secret Service and everyone else with respect and honour, thanked everyone all the time. He took the time to know everyone on a personal level. One favourite story was early in his Presidency when he came out of his room with a pistol tucked on his hip. The agent in charge asked: “Why the pistol, Mr. President?” He replied, “In case you boys can’t get the job done, I can help.” It was common for him to carry a pistol. When he met with Gorbachev, he had a pistol in his briefcase.
*She was very nice but very protective of the President and the Secret Service was often caught in the middle. She tried hard to control what he ate. He would say to the agent, “Come on, you gotta help me out.” The Reagan’s drank wine during State dinners and special occasions only otherwise they shunned alcohol. The Secret Service could count on one hand the times they were served wine during family dinner. For all the fake bluster of the Carters, the Reagan’s were the ones who lived life as genuinely moral people.*
  https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                            stand in line 10                                            .jpg?attredirects=0
*Extremely kind and considerate, always respectful. Took great care in making sure the agents’ comforts were taken care of. They even brought them meals. One time she brought warm clothes to agents standing outside at Kennebunkport. One was given a warm hat and, when he tried to say “no thanks” even though he was obviously freezing, the President said “Son, don’t argue with the First Lady. Put the hat on.” He was the most prompt of the Presidents. He ran the White House like a well-oiled machine.*
*She ruled the house and spoke her mind.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                              stand in line 9                                              .jpg?attredirects=0
*Presidency was one giant party. Not trustworthy. He was nice mainly because he wanted everyone to like him but to him life is just one big game and party. Everyone knows about his sexuality.*
*She is another phony. Her personality would change the instant cameras were near. She hated, with open disdain the military and Secret Service. She was another who felt people were there to serve her. She was always trying to keep tabs on Bill Clinton.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                            stand in                                            line12.jpg?attredirects=0
*An egotistical ass who was once overheard by his Secret Service detail lecturing his son that he needed to do better in school or he would end up like these guys, pointing to the agents.*
  https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                            stand in line 15                                            .jpg?attredirects=0
*The Secret Service loved him and Laura Bush. He was also the most physically in shape who had a very strict workout regimen. The Bushes made sure their entire administrative and household staff understood that they were to respect and be considerate of the Secret Service.*
*She was one of the nicest First Ladies, if not the nicest. She never had any harsh word to say about anyone.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                              stand in line 14                                              .jpg?attredirects=0
*Clinton all over again – hates the military and looks down on the Secret Service. He is egotistical and cunning. He looks you in the eye and appears to agree with you but turns around and does the opposite. He has temper tantrums.*
*She is a complete bitch who basically hates anybody who is not black, hates the military and looks at the Secret Service as servants.*
https://sites.google.com/site/sundayfamilyhumour9/sunday-family-humour--26th-july/Never                                          stand in line 13                                          .jpg?attredirects=0
A ‘TRUE STORY ABOUT’ General Chrystal’s resignation in Obama’s office from General McChrystal’sbook,  “NEVER STAND IN LINE AGAIN”
Some men carry and handle their diplomacy better than others. When former U.S. Military commander in Afghanistan, General McChrystal, was called into the Oval Office by Barack Obama, he knew things weren’t going to go well when the President accused him of not supporting him in his political role as President.
“It’s not my job to support you as a politician, Mr. President, it’s my job to support you as Commander-in-Chief,”  McChrystal replied, and he handed Obama his resignation.
Not satisfied with accepting McChrystal’s resignation, the President made a cheap parting shot.  “I bet when I die you’ll be happy to piss on my grave.”
The General saluted and said, “Mr. President, I always told myself after leaving the Army I’d never stand in line again.”

Justice Scalia dead at 79

Posted by newtogold @ 17:11 on February 13, 2016  

Scares me to think what anti Constitutionalist will replace him. We will never get another defender of the Constitution like him.  The US will continue to get the short end of the stick.

Posted by goldielocks @ 16:18 on February 13, 2016  

Has a friend recently tell me to take Coq10 because it gave her so much energy. I told her before about it but her Doctor  not recommending it she didn’t take it as she didn’t connect statin with the cholesterol lowering drugs she was taking which were statins. I don’t take Meds for anything so would not notice the difference to her degree.  At least she started taking them felt the difference after awhile, big difference and probably saved her life as she will now keep taking them.


Was it really necessary

Posted by Ororeef @ 16:16 on February 13, 2016  

to Overthrow    Mubarek

to overthrow Saddam Hussein

to overthrow     Kadahfi

to overthrow      ASSAD     Who was it that dreamed up that Policy ?   They were all strong men that kept the Peace ,in a area full of CRAZY RELIGIOUS FANATICS   …What MORON decided they needed or wanted DEMOCRACY  ?   I figure about 500,000 died 100,000 wounded ,and millions displaced from thier Homes ……..and it aint over YET     .WHO MADE that DECISION ?    Who is going to be held accountable ? What LIBERAL   will be held accountable in a COURT of Justice at the HAGUE  and convict him of WAR CRIMES  and Hang HIM  or HER ?   ARE WAR CRIME Trials only for RIGHT WINGERS  ?  Like Hitler ?   Where is the Hypocrisy’s Trial for Leftists ?

I expect from jan 20 to end of year

Posted by Ororeef @ 15:59 on February 13, 2016  

the prices will double ,,in 5 waves  ….so I would buy the dips    as North suggests  .3rd wave start about may 18 and will be spectacular !

Im not suggesting Elliott waves …but It looks like it  ..I havent studied them..I am a more a student of cycles . I think Gold will get to $2000 ,but with pent up demand and the severe restraining thats occured   it could easily act like a coiled SPRING and overshoot before it settles back ….

in any case I intend to ride the JOY ride ..Its been a long time coming !

Nick Hanauer – plutocrat

Posted by larryc @ 13:36 on February 13, 2016  



Posted by treefrog @ 13:30 on February 13, 2016  

life is never simple.  there are always a large number of factors involved.

slow, stupid, lazy, self indulgent, unlucky, weak, will make you a loser.

quick, smart, hard working, thrifty, lucky, strong, will make you a winner.

everyone has varying balances of these traits (and without a doubt, others), and the combinations are what make for the infinitely differing results.  some of these we have a choice about, some, not so much.

you mentioned that you liked to live in a country where you are able to own things.  i do too.  even more, i like living in a country where there is the ability to move from loser to winner (social mobility).  the bad news is that it works the other way too.

i grew up in middle class conditions, perhaps in the lower quartile of middle class, but the families of the people i associated with weren’t hurting.  some of them did pretty well.  through the combination of above traits with which i was endowed,  at age 71, i may have reached the top quartile of the middle class.  it has been my observation that good sense, hard work, strength, and yes, luck played a large part in the journey from where i started to here.

it has also, sadly, been my observation that lack of those traits have consequences.  a high school friend and fishing buddy of mine came from a family that had a string of three hardware stores – good prospects, moderate wealth, security.  (he always had primo fishing tackle!)  he did well until, at about 45 he inherited the family business.  with the help of good bourbon, high purity cocaine, and a spendthrift wife, it only took him fifteen years to demolish the business that had taken three generations to build.

those who have unearned wealth will either learn to maintain it (earning the right to keep it), or it will disappear.   i think you are not patient enough to wait for the inherent, random “fairness” of the world to manifest.  sometimes it takes generations.  sometimes centuries…

Well BG, I might have been way off on $75 gold rise yesterday but according to ipso’s post, the Turkey shoot is on.

Posted by macroman3 @ 13:13 on February 13, 2016  

So maybe a hunnert rise next week is still on….

DB and CS Lehman weekend???

The psychos are running wild

Posted by ipso facto @ 12:47 on February 13, 2016  

Turkey Shells Aleppo, Says “Massive Escalation” In Syria Imminent As Saudis Ready Airstrikes


Lou Holtz

Posted by larryc @ 12:02 on February 13, 2016  

Where to start? I have known for years that the political leanings on this board do not much agree with mine.  I long ago decided that it was to my advantage to come here for the information I found interesting, and for the reason I came here in the first place, gold and silver.

Although close friends might label me as a liberal, upon further investigation, they would find that my political views are across the board. It depends on the subject, and sometimes my current mood.  I have found that the easiest and cheapest way to make a political argument is to categorize peoples views, and consider that group as a whole.  But if we really looked at ourselves individually, we would surely find that we individually are not that easy to categorize.

If a group were looking for a spokesperson, they could do FAR better than the likes of Lou Holtz.  I have no more to say about that.  But this presentation, which I don’t really know for fact came from him ( no insult to the poster intended), it is so fraught with holes I don’t know where to start.  But since I am not going to spend much time on this, I would like to make just one point. (or two)

If we categorize all people who are down as lifetime lazy people who’s intent is to take what others have, how would you categorize me?  I’ve been down. I remember that I once qualified for unemployment pay but chose not to take it because I didn’t really need it.  Others do and have needed it, and it saved families from more hardship and  possible hunger.

Are there shit-ass lazy poor people out there?  Sure.  Are there shit-ass lazy rich people out there who didn’t earn a dime? Sure.  What’s the point? What’s YOUR point?

I live in a country where I have the right to own things, and people can’t take them from me.  There are many places I could have been brought up in and lived where the government could take everything I have and put me on the street. I didn’t do it by myself.  Because of where I live, I have the luxury of being able to, for the most part, keep what I have, and what I have earned.  President Obama made this point a couple years ago, didn’t say it as well as he could have, and got blasted .  I GET IT.

Do I “like” our government and what they’re doing? Not so much.  Do I like what the FED has done to our finances and to our economy? Not so much. Do I like people who try to pigeon-hole  and label others based on their political views?  Not so much.

Comments that come from right or left wing thinkers are cheap and insulting.  VERY few of us fit into either category.  And even worse, it’s polarizing, and  tends to drive us apart, when we should be spending our time  exploring common ground.


That should do me for about 10 years.  I’ll express more thoughts in 2025 if I’m still kickin’.  (whether you like it or not!)

North @ 8:21 on February 13, 2016

Posted by Ororeef @ 11:35 on February 13, 2016  

i EXPECT a Pull back mid March

North @ 8:53 on February 13, 2016

Posted by Ororeef @ 11:33 on February 13, 2016  

This not your Fathers Bull Market !

Older Posts »
Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.