OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

Weaker dollar – no help

Posted by Buygold @ 10:12 on July 30, 2018  

same shit, different day

R640 – good luck with whatever calls you buy. I know my sentiment is at an all-time low

Who ya gonna believe? Fred Hickey or my dumb ass? I think I’ll go with Fred and open a position in some g&S calls

Posted by Richard640 @ 9:35 on July 30, 2018  

Fred

Posted by Richard640 @ 9:32 on July 30, 2018  

Fred Hickey

Managing Director at SmartChoice Financial Brokers & Director at International Golf Advisors & Chairman of WeBringg Ltd

Ireland
Logistics and Supply Chain
Current
  1. Smart Choice Financial Brokers,
  2. WeBringg,
  3. International Golf Advisors
Previous
  1. Brennan Pension & Investments,
  2. Bank of Scotland (Ireland),
  3. Scottish Provident Ireland (subsidiary of Abbey National Group)

The great Fred Hickey thinks the “bottomz Inn” bell has rung for gold–from ZH

Posted by Richard640 @ 9:30 on July 30, 2018  

“The $2.3 billion Vanguard Precious Metals and Mining Fund (VGPMX) will be renamed to Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund as part of a restructuring intended to broaden the fund’s mandate and diversify its portfolio.” They don’t ring bells at tops&bottoms?https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vanguard-makes-changes-to-two-active-equity-funds-300687845.html 

AFTER the huge 30%, 6 month climb in gold (160% up for gold stocks) in the summer of 2016, Schwab sent to its customers a “Guide to Investing In Gold.” It was the death knell for the rally. Haven’t been able to break through that top since. Maybe now we have the sign (Vanguard).

A requested repost—sorry about the Caps but I’ve no time to retype-I am still running 8 corporations.

Posted by Richard640 @ 9:22 on July 30, 2018  

THERE WILL NEVER BE ANOTHER CRASH OR SERIOUS, LONG,  BEAR STOCK MARKET AGAIN IN OUR LIFETIMES

**********************************************************

WE WILL NEVER SEE A BULL MARKET AGAIN IN GOLD–ALL DUE TO THE FINANCIALIZATION OF EVERY NATIONS ECONOMY–HERE’S WHY===

************************************************************

With central bankers so celebrated for blatantly manipulating markets, of course politicians, dictators and the like would insist on getting a piece of the action. Inflating financial markets became essential to power – economic, political and geopolitical. And as finance became integral to economic growth and the global power play, why not use financial sanctions or the threat of financial repercussions to dictate nation-state behavior? And, over time, attaining financial wealth became an absolute prerequisite for wielding geopolitical power and influence.

The old military variety appears almost feeble standing next to the contemporary Financial Arms Race. And if you seek dominance – domestically, regionally and/or internationally – you had better get a tight rein on the securities markets – whether you’re in Washington, Ankara, Moscow or Beijing. Beijing (and it’s “national team”) moved ahead in this regard, but it would appear Washington is today keen to play catch up. As market-based finance has commandeered the world, the centers of global power have moved to take command of the markets.

 

http://creditbubblebulletin.blogspot.com/2018/07/weekly-commentary-intimidate-nobody.html

Maddog–readers respond to the article u linked:—Nobody in China gives a diddly rats ass for silver

Posted by Richard640 @ 7:54 on July 30, 2018  

Blue Dog  valerie24 Sat, 07/28/2018 – 18:06  Permalink

Silver is even bigger. It’s trading at about 80 to 1 against gold when it comes out of the ground at 10 to 1. Eventually when the paper market no longer rules we’ll see both silver and gold explode higher. I have most of my savings in physical silver and gold.
********************************************************************
Uh, Earth to BluDog: nobody but nobody in China gives a diddley rats ass about silver…..and 80:1 shows exzactly that. and that is 1/6 of the planet. We gotta deal with the real facts, not hopes and aspirations.

FYI

Posted by Richard640 @ 7:47 on July 30, 2018  
And lastly, my favourite cartoon for the week.

Mr Copper

Posted by goldielocks @ 0:35 on July 30, 2018  

This is why we can’t go back to those 5000 dollar homes.
This is what happened to a city I lived in, in my teens although the house I lived in I believe was 35K then.
The comparison when I left in late 60s in population more than doubled due to migrants.
This BS that migrants are good is not true, maybe some bit not a tsunami. It’s destroying city’s by cities and they’re becoming the majority. Sylmar was meant to be a horse owners area in the foothills of the mountains.

The population of the Sylmar area was roughly 3,500 in 1940, 10,000 in 1950, 31,000 in 1962,[1] 40,000 in 1972,[2] 41,922 in 1980[3] and 53,392 in 1986.[4] By 2000, a “wave of immigrants and working poor” had enveloped Sylmar, Pacoima, Arleta and Sun Valley, resulting in a housing shortage for lower-income people.[5] The 2000 U.S. census counted 69,499 residents in the 12.46-square-mile Sylmar neighborhood—or 5,579 people per square mile, among the lowest population densities for the city. In 2008, the city estimated that the population had increased to 79,614.[6] In 2009, the Sylmar Chamber of Commerce estimated that the population was approximately 90,000 residents.[7]

In 1980 Sylmar was predominantly white,[3] the ethnic breakdown being 58% white and 36% Latino.[8] Twenty years later, in 2000, the neighborhood was considered “moderately diverse” ethnically within Los Angeles, with a relatively high percentage of Latinos. The breakdown in 2000 was Latinos, 69.8%; whites, 20.7%; blacks, 4.1%; Asians, 3.4%, and others, 2.0%. Mexico (71.7%) and El Salvador (8.4%) were the most common places of birth for the 36.7% of the residents who were born abroad—an average figure for Los Angeles. In 2000 the median age for residents was 28, considered young for city and county neighborhoods.[6]

In 2000, renters occupied 29.2% of the housing stock, and house- or apartment-owners held 70.8%. The average household size of 3.6 people was considered high for Los Angeles. The percentage of married women (55.5%) was among the county’s highest. There were 3,607 veterans, or 7.7% of the population, average for the city of Los Angeles and the county.[6]

A study by four graduate students from the University of Southern California in 2005 stated that:

Sylmar in the 1970s and 1980s was a rural, predominantly white, non-Hispanic community, whose residents focused on creating a place centered around equestrian activities. Today, the dramatic influx of residents has serious consequences for a community that has too little housing stock, too few employment opportunities, overburdened public facilities and decaying public infrastructure systems.[9]

« Newer Posts
Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.