OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

Farmboy, my tractor seat conversation with you today would focus, from my side, on the following.

Posted by Equisetum @ 15:02 on January 10, 2017  

It seems to me that whoever (or whatever power structures) selected your next president must have liked the idea of a Goldman Sachs-weighted cabinet.  Although I cannot produce any Wikileaks evidence to back up my opinion, my gut reaction is to place my bets with the J. P. Morgan forces rather than the Goldman Sachs forces.  If J. P. Morgan (with its rumored large accumulation of physical silver and its vaults and tunnels and trading desks  deep in the Long Island bedrock) is of ownership interest to the Chinese, then it seems to be good enough for me too.  I’ll go with the silver accumulation like J. P. Morgan.

Now maybe there are some small wrinkles still requiring attention if Mr. Trump aims to have a friendly and constructive relationship with Mr. Putin.  If Goldman Sachs forces are going to have strong influence in the Trump  administration, and if Mr. Putin has really in the past not welcomed Goldman Sachs to operations within Russia, I cannot yet see if Trump and Putin will see eye-to-eye on several important matters.  I cant quite see them taking to a Trump-owned golf course meeting to resolve differences between them, but if Mr. Putin could just get Mr. Trump to join him for a winter  horseback ride in the Siberian taiga region then maybe they could come to some agreement about the Goldman Sachs approach to things versus the J. P. Morgan  silver-weighted approach.

I’m hoping for a good year for silver and I hope you have a good year too.  Cheers.  Equiz

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.