OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

Farmboy @10:18 and ipso_facto@10:28. With you entirely on the idea of continuing to hold MUX.

Posted by Equisetum @ 11:47 on September 21, 2017  

Not that I have any insights into the pros and cons of the latest announced plans by MUX.  It is just that I was convinced some time ago that MUX, First Majestic, and First Mining Finance all deserved to be in our buy and hold basket.  My rationale was and is fairly straight forward; it is my feeling that someone who was in charge of previous developmental action in entities like  Goldcorp, First Quantum, and First Majestic must have some corporate savvy still available for application in today’s setting in the PM sector.  I have no anxiety in keeping a substantial portfolio of our PM-related portfolio under the guidance of McEwen and Neumeyer.  Cheers.  Equiz

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.