Loading ...First they have to prove “ and by no means taking sides with the cabal” there is a substance doing harm.
The last thing you want to do when people’s lives are at risk is go in the wrong direction in a reason to stop this vaccine from harming more people and now children. They will just say it’s false claims.
Without that proof one can only look for relativity. Just like the mark of the beast, is it relative or subjective to a persons interpretation.
What I am currently interpreting with this mandate is vaccines that are clearly injuring and killing people but yet it is not stopped immediately is the mark of marxists.
The bully freed themselves of accountability. Now they think they can hurt your children in front of you and you won’t stop them. That they can do anything they want to your children but your to weak to protect them. That must give they a incredible sick sense of power.
They certainly won’t stop based on having as sense of responsibility.
They don’t even have to worry anymore of trust or accountability of people who will then not have it don’t even have to sell it to you because they got corrupt politicians to force it on you.
Perhaps what could be relative is that in the sense there are people who follow God as well as want to play God just as there’s people who want to follow satin as well as would want play satin.
In the case of satin there is no safety in following him just being his victim as we’re Adam and Eve.
Is there a relatively in the word Apple today or would that be subject to interpretation.
From very little I know on the subject seeing what happened to those people in Cuba you apparently don’t need a substance injected into your body for these pulses to harm you. I don’t think they’re ionizing either but know little about it.
The main point to me is what is factually causing harm?
There is a mass propaganda of denial out there that any finding of harm as well as any treatment that helps like Ivermectin despite factual evidence it does is called false or false claims. They put that out there despite not having proof it doesn’t help because it’s a lie and suiciding their own credibility.
Getting factual information out to people on how to protect themselves is time centered.
Going in the wrong direction only aids in their denial of truth by attacking credibility accusing people of making false claims.
Currently anyone who says Ivermectin has relevance to preventing and treating Covid is accused of making false claims.
First we need proof it’s in there. It’s human nature to want to believe anything negative someone says that you perceive as a monster but more important is protecting people from the facts on hand.
I can’t say if it isn’t or is but can’t see the proof. No one is questioning what’s in it or a third party doing so that is known to us.