It needs constant prompting and guidance. There is no intelligence there at all, you have to do all the thinking for it. I used Claude, and even when I suggested a company it didn’t do the hard yards. It just read a couple of company reports and sycophantically reported that it looked very good. It didn’t analyse the data to see the inconsistencies between reports which showed a 30% to 40% decrease in recoveries from the primary circuit in pilot plant testing. The company was still applying the lab test results across the deposit even though the pilot plant had not only not scaled up, but they had abandoned that process as not gonna work. GIGO definitely, but the worry is that very few of us realise it. Doctors galloping away with AI suggestions because it is sold as intelligent, the answer to all our health problems, tap in the symptoms and do as the computer tells you is going to be disastrous for some. Because that is how it is being sold. The smart guys like you and soee will benefit because you realise its limitations. The dumb actors who take its advice on a meningioma in the cavernous sinus will damage the patient irreparably – because that is the expected outcome and other tried and tested techniques will be ignored.