Loading ...I agree with a lot of what you said but not all. Things weren’t all that great for women before all this mess we have going on now.
Some of these so called strong men when women didn’t have jobs or much opportunities were losers, self centered bullies, even child molesters and rapists. The grave yards are full of those who followed them instead of leaving them. They’re not their boss.
It’s not about following them it’s about wanting to be with them and sharing the same things and lifestyle and working out the differences. If they want them to stay home can they support them and do they want to stay home?
When woman had to work many lazy or insecure men used the excuse not to help with the cooking or cleaning as women’s work. The law also didn’t protect them from criminal activity back then it was either the community or the woman themselves. Now more and more woman are arming themselves.
Many woman had to wait until the kids grew up before they left them because they didn’t have the education or means to support themselves and their kids or they found someone else. So it may appear less single parents or divorces.
Many women also died from botched or self induced abortions because the man didn’t care enough to prevent a pregnancy but if they did get pregnant told them to get rid of it or they’ll leave them or worse.
Even one woman here who used to post and no longer here who did have some skills escaped after having enough of a bad scene. So easily people can forget all that.
That after that merged in the drugs and the baby boomers. Hundreds of books have been written on the drug problem, doctors and drugs , government and drugs and still going on, and pot including adding to recipes and how to grow it. Many women died with men giving them that too.
Many of that era are the seniors in government now, the babyboomers suddenly self-righteous with short memories.
It was used to weaken,
morals and break up the family unit and a attack on religion. It was also used to kill off minorities turning to crime instead of jobs in the inner cities.
Then aids as the gay orgies and bath houses grew.
When that wasn’t enough the open attack on white men and gender rolls started. I think I’m large part because the enemy will likely go after the strongest first.
Some of these women you mention don’t think they want strong men because they associate them with abusive men but they may not be coming from the side they think.
Certain people are then using it to weaponized it to push the gay agenda to not to want to be with men at all and why that turned into multi pronouns including not gay but not interested or happier single. That in turn, can also turn men off but don’t assume they want one and want them turned off.
On the other hand many of these minority women want a white man to be their sugar daddy.
I remember during the Obama election some black women talking about the racisim and singing we shall overcome come and then they saw two clean cut nice looking white guys on Harley’s. Couple of them said they wanted that kinda guy. That was never gonna happen.
So see what they’re doing. They haven’t figured out yet they’re not going to be able bully them into being with them instead of their own race. Same with radical libs.
I don’t see so much women competing with men though or wanting the same job as competing if their able to do it but men, weak men either by insecurities or strength with women.
They did a poll once in the 80 s on who was the happiest. It surprised me enough and concerning enough to remember it today.
The happiest to least happiest people in this order.
1. Married men.
2. Single women.
3. Single men.
4 Married women