Loading ...That whole thing was complicated. Once when we were in friendlier terms with Iran, they were paying for equipment also involved in a rebellion. Did that rebellion go into the wrong hands when we had radical Muslims objecting against westernization and freedom of women not to have to wear hijab s. The Shaw was overthrown. We’re we ” western countries” indirectly responsible for that?
Back to religious ideology they are named after. Then the hostage issue they were no longer on friendly terms. The millions had supposedly grew over a billion in interest.
How did they come to that conclusion and doubt they ever put that money in a interest bearing trust.
Under the circumstances no matter, what is the definition of aiding and abetting the enemy.
Metals guy
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.