Loading ...Due to unfortunate circumstances I know a sexual predator and several of his victims. Whilst he had them under his sway so that nobody talked, as soon as the dam broke then others came forward. Admittedly there is at least one who will not speak, will not go to the police, but as far as I know most of his victims are known. There are no videos or photos in this case, but if they had existed I am certain that those victims would willingly permit such material being made public for two reasons:
a) it would help ensure his conviction; and
b) it would prove to all the people who think that they are lying that they are not.
He has a silver tongue and continued to persuade authorities to let him keep his teaching and youth activities positions even after the first accuser came forward.
If they have videos of child porn, why are people not being prosecuted? Are the POTUS and the AG saying that we can’t prosecute because juries would have to see child porn – even though victims’ faces can be fogged out? Is it now a defence in pornography cases to say that the POTUS and AG have set a precedent – “You must not show the video. The President says so.”