Loading ...If aircraft carriers are so easily destroyed, why hasn’t anyone hit the United States one of eleven aircraft carriers with a hypersonic missile? If these hypersonic tools are so bad ass, why isn’t anyone using it? Smells like BS.
I stick to my guns with nukes too. These drunken russians aren’t servicing their ICBM’s. We’ve spent something like $20B maintaining the US arsenal and projected to spend another Trillion. I don’t care about what makes them go off in particular. How they work isn’t important. It’s just IF they work or not. So I’m fading the subject.
What it comes down to is that aircraft carriers are a serious portable weaponized force, and very expensive to operate. This is why Australia doesn’t have a single carrier, it’s not b/c “these ships are easily sank” so we’ll forego having them. Compare the US military expenditures to russians. The US found 10X to fund the war machine. Putin, no matter how fast he prints, can’t get it up. He talks like he has a big co*k, but really he’s faking. It’s all bullshit. Crappy engineering, horrible materials, designs thought out on paper and not computers. There’s nothing state of the art in russia. It’s dumbed down angry men. Just like the middle east.